Gay marriage move lacks 'clear mandate' warns Bishop

By Tim Clarke Wednesday 06 February 2013 Updated: 07/02 13:45

THE BISHOP of Worcester says moves towards legalising same-sex marriages lack a 'clear mandate' and has called on politicians to slow down the process.

The warning from the Right Rev Dr John Inge comes after MPs voted by a majority of 225 in favour of gay marriages.

Among the 400 MPs to back the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill during its second reading on Tuesday was Worcester's Robin Walker, despite 136 of his Tory colleagues opposing it.

Although the bill has some way to go before it becomes law, Bishop John questioned the speed at which the legislation was being pushed through Parliament.

"We will continue to raise questions about whether it is wise or appropriate to legislate at such speed on a matter of such fundamental importance to society, when the proposal was not in any major party manifesto, the Coalition Agreement or the last Queen's Speech," he said.

"The lack of a clear mandate and the absence of an overwhelming public consensus for change ought at least to give pause for thought.”

If the bill becomes law same-sex couples will be able to get married in both civil and religious ceremonies - the latter only with the consent of religious institutions.

But Bishop John said the Church continued to hold the view marriage was a union between one man and one woman although he recognised there were differences of opinion.

"I do not however believe that holding to a traditional understanding of marriage is, or should be, regarded as a discriminatory position," he said.

Bishop John added the Church would also raise questions about the implications of the bill for wider society such as the significance for raising children as part of the purpose of marriage, the impact on teaching in schools, the work of chaplains and others with religious convictions working in the public sector.

Worcester MP Robin Walker said he had sought assurances from ministers the bill would not encroach on the freedoms and beliefs of religious groups before voting to support it.

"Although personally as an Anglican Christian I do believe marriage is between a man and a woman, if there is a civil marriage available and if other religious groups have different views they should be able to carry out same-sex marriages," he said.

"I think marriage is a very valuable institution and I don't think we should deprive any part of the community of that.

"But I also think it's very clear from the constituents I have heard from that church groups feel strongly they want to keep a definition of marriage being between a man and woman and I think they should be entirely free to do so."

The bill will now be scrutinised and go to the House of Lords before coming back to MPs for a final decision.

Share This

Popular »

1 Work begins on former Russell and Dorrell site

2 Arrivederci as restaurant shuts its doors

More news »

Woman sexually assaulted in park

A WOMAN in her 20s was sexually assaulted

Drivers targeted by fake gold fraudsters

DRIVERS have been warned not to buy fake

This week's letters to the editor

Re: Smokers offered incentives to kick habit (The

LEADER'S COLUMN - Simon Geraghty

AT WORCESTER City Council thoughts are firmly focused

Regional news »

Stratford Observer
Branching out for charity

CARING Stratford residents can remember a loved one and help ...

Bromsgrove Standard
Development of key Bromsgrove town centre sites a step closer

THE DEVELOPMENT of the two ends of Bromsgrove High Street ...

Redditch Standard
Separate police leaders a 'waste of money'

JOINING two police forces but keeping separate leadership teams could ...

Evesham Observer
Festive fare at fayre

HUNDREDS of pounds was raised when a Vale village hosted ...